<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.0.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:17:16 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>SteveLosh.com - Comments</title><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/</link><description>Steve Losh's Blog.</description><copyright>Copyright © 2008, Steve Losh. All rights reserved.</copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.0.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Steve Losh comments on Beauty in Computer Science: Recursion</title><author>Steve Losh</author><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:16:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/8/29/beauty-in-computer-science-recursion.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/2008499</guid><description><![CDATA[@Elliot<br/><br/>Only up to the point where the Integer is so big that your system can't hold it and it's OS/program/etc code at the same time.  That function is tail recursive, which in some languages will get optimized out so the stack won't overflow.<br/><br/>But in general, I was talking about the abstract math concept, not the implementation.  We'll always be bounded by hardware, unfortunately.<br/><br/>And thanks.]]></description></item><item><title>Brooks comments on Beauty in Computer Science: Recursion</title><author>Brooks</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:33:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/8/29/beauty-in-computer-science-recursion.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/2002950</guid><description><![CDATA[My friend's take on sciences: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/willdoesntexist/2650523871/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/willdoesntexist/2650523871/</a>]]></description></item><item><title>Brooks comments on Negative Space</title><author>Brooks</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:28:47 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/9/1/negative-space.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/2002941</guid><description><![CDATA[Sweet idea and great post!]]></description></item><item><title>Laura comments on Negative Space</title><author>Laura</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:30:25 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/9/1/negative-space.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/2002146</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the idea of negative space is applicable to much more than most people realize or bother to consider. Good for you for seizing upon the idea and for expressing it well.]]></description></item><item><title>Katy comments on Negative Space</title><author>Katy</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:35:45 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/9/1/negative-space.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/1994235</guid><description><![CDATA[Absolutely! I couldn't agree more. I know that this is something I've been exploring in dancing lately as well (something to do with the fact that we all dance with each other, I suppose). Thank you, dear, for pulling just the right term from visual art and applying it to dance! I never would've used the word, but it's perfect. Lately, it's been leaders who take advantage of negative space who really stick out for me. I see some Blues dancers move so much and it always seemed off. Here I thought it had to do with my laziness. :)<br/><br/>As a writer, having the right word is very important to me. Thanks!]]></description></item><item><title>Elliot comments on Beauty in Computer Science: Recursion</title><author>Elliot</author><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:20:06 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/8/29/beauty-in-computer-science-recursion.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/1854739</guid><description><![CDATA[&quot;...the addition function can create more numbers than that.&quot;<br/><br/>Well, it depends on your system memory a bit... ; )<br/><br/>CS is quite beautiful, though. Great post. You explain things very well.]]></description></item><item><title>Steve Losh comments on Here we go again.</title><author>Steve Losh</author><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/2/21/here-we-go-again.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/1779127</guid><description><![CDATA[Test comment.]]></description></item><item><title>Adam Sneller comments on Microsoft Entourage + AppleScript = Frustration</title><author>Adam Sneller</author><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 02:04:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/2/21/microsoft-entourage-applescript-frustration.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/1403132</guid><description><![CDATA[Does this script run from Entourage 2008?  Were you able to implement GUI scripting from the Entourage Scripts Menu?]]></description></item><item><title>Jocelyn comments on My First Day with Leopard</title><author>Jocelyn</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:16:36 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/3/2/my-first-day-with-leopard.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/1382752</guid><description><![CDATA[I have yet to even purchase Leopard for my iMac.  I hope to get around to doing so shortly.  Glad to read some Likes/Dislikes about it though!]]></description></item><item><title>Steve Losh comments on Photography Class Final Project</title><author>Steve Losh</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:29:32 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.stevelosh.com/blog/2008/2/21/photography-class-final-project.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">54302:1980953:comment/1313583</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks!  I'm really not happy with the Singing one at all, but I guess 7 out of 8 isn't too bad.]]></description></item></channel></rss>